Nine years ago, San Francisco banned plastic shopping bags and set off a movement that鈥檚 led nearly half the state and its biggest cities to do the same. Skipping the bags at checkout was a hassle at first, but now folks don鈥檛 seem to miss the throwaway sacks on a grocery trip.
With so many shoppers adapting to the change, Sacramento passed a statewide ban roping in the rest of California two years ago. But that move is on hold due to the well-funded interest of a handful of bag makers.
They鈥檙e spending $5 million to push a confusing double play on the state ballot. Proposition 67 is a referendum on the law, with a 鈥測es鈥� keeping the ban and a 鈥渘o鈥� vote dumping it. But the industry is clouding the picture further with Proposition 65, which requires that proceeds from a 10-cent paper bag fee go to environmental causes.
Voters shouldn鈥檛 be fooled by what鈥檚 at stake. In a world doused with everlasting plastic, grocery store bags play a harmful role, winding up on beaches, parks and trees, choking fish and wildlife and even clogging recycling machines. Cutting down usage, especially when cloth or paper bags can be swapped in, makes sense.
Bag makers 鈥� in this case four major out-of-state manufacturers 鈥� are clearly spooked. If California sticks with banning food-store bags, then other states will join the cause, the industry worries. Also, as consumers grow mindful of the long-term effects of plastic on the environment, the material will be scrutinized and regulated in ways that manufacturers can鈥檛 control.
To read the full story, visit .